We have presented a collection of tactics that the architect can use to achieve particular attributes. In fact, an architect usually chooses a pattern or a collection of patterns designed to realize one or more tactics. However, each pattern implements multiple tactics, whether desired or not. We illustrate this by discussing the Active Object design pattern, as described by [Schmidt 00]:
The Active Object design pattern decouples method execution from method invocation to enhance concurrency and simplify synchronized access to objects that reside in their own thread of control.
The pattern consists of six elements: a proxy, which provides an interface that allows clients to invoke publicly accessible methods on an active object; a method request, which defines an interface for executing the methods of an active object; an activation list, which maintains a buffer of pending method requests; a scheduler, which decides what method requests to execute next; a servant, which defines the behavior and state modeled as an active object; and a future, which allows the client to obtain the result of the method invocation.
The motivation for this pattern is to enhance concurrency?a performance goal. Thus, its main purpose is to implement the "introduce concurrency" performance tactic. Notice the other tactics this pattern involves, however.
Information hiding (modifiability). Each element chooses the responsibilities it will achieve and hides their achievement behind an interface.
Intermediary (modifiability). The proxy acts as an intermediary that will buffer changes to the method invocation.
Binding time (modifiability). The active object pattern assumes that requests for the object arrive at the object at runtime. The binding of the client to the proxy, however, is left open in terms of binding time.
Scheduling policy (performance). The scheduler implements some scheduling policy.
Any pattern implements several tactics, often concerned with different quality attributes, and any implementation of the pattern also makes choices about tactics. For example, an implementation could maintain a log of requests to the active object for supporting recovery, maintaining an audit trail, or supporting testability.
The analysis process for the architect involves understanding all of the tactics embedded in an implementation, and the design process involves making a judicious choice of what combination of tactics will achieve the system's desired goals.